Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture Type: Chapter; Author(s): Louis Montrose; Date: ; Page start: ; Page end: ; Web. Louis Adrian Montrose is an American literary theorist and academic scholar. His scholarship has addressed a wide variety of literary, historical, and theoretical topics and issues, and has significantly shaped contemporary studies of Renaissance poetics, English Renaissance theatre, Louis Montrose’s Homepage · Professing the Renaissance · Miriam Chen’s. Professing the Renaissance: The Poetics and Politics of Culture. Louis A. Montrose. There has recently emerged within Renaissance studies, as in Anglo- Ameri.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||11 May 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.24 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As pointed earlier, while his name is mentioned several times alongside those of Stephen Ptofessing and Catherine Gallagher, very little attention has been paid to his actual work so far. The conversation with the living that I started is thus perhaps only the beginning, more of a chat really: We have a redefinition of literature in the sense that is becomes part of social history, rather than art history. The excerpt here is one that illustrates the synchronic autonomy of the text against culture: This tendency renxissance, however, not occur in every one of the seven texts used as background material here.
The work is not that of one genius, it is part of a community and culture which precedes the author in his writing. Because of this, prpfessing cannot read the original properly. Reality is drawn into the text, making the text part of what is outside and a cultural sign. Some explicitly sum up certain characteristics that define the New Historicism, while others simply try to explain the foundations of the practice.
Oddly enough, his other two analyses that are looked at here were not diachronic: Yet, what is professinb theoretical framework without nontrose practice? This was written over 14 years ago and as of today we still lack this operational definition. Consequently, this means that the New Historicist starts to look beyond the centre of the text, to the borders of the text, where the text intertwines and integrates with society and vice versa.
Unlike the two other analyses, the b text also shows signs of a diachronic approach, despite what Montrose b: However, due to the limited nature of this thesis, it would be wrong to draw this conclusion. Log In Sign Up. Dutton, Richard and Richard Wilson. While Montrose claims not to psychoanalyze, he does so anyway.
Unlike my supervisor, I did not find myself looking for words in the cellar of a bookshop in Utrecht; instead, I found myself inspired in a lecture hall in Ghent back in Maythe last semester of my third year as an undergraduate student.
I mean to suggest a process of subjectification that, on the one hand, shapes individuals as loci of consciousness and initiators of action, endows them with subjectivity; and that, on the other hand, positions, motivates, and constrains them within – subjects them to – social networks and cultural codes that exceed their comprehension or control. Levinson, Marjorie, et al.
Briefly and too simply characterized, its collective project is to resituate canonical literary texts among the multiple forms of writing, and in relation to the non-discursive practices and institutions, of the social formation in which those texts have been produced—while, at the same time, recognizing that this project of historical resituation is necessarily the textual construction of critics who are themselves historical subjects.
The following quote illustrates this returning idea: However, the work needed in order to fully excavate these poetics could not be undertaken in the span of a thesis.
Like displays we might see in a gallery or museum, texts 11 Note: Princeton University Press, What does this tell us about Louis Montrose? Greenblatt, Stephen, and Catherine Gallagher. Authority, Gender and Representation As Stephen Greenblatt points out, what was really worrying for the Queen was both the repeatability of the representation – and hence the multiplying numbers of people witnessing it – and the locations of these repetitions: Thus when wanting to observe a set of shared assumptions of the New Historicism, modelled onto Abrams, this means a two-folded subdivision will need to be made, i.
The constructions of the past are presumed as intimately tied to the present. This tells us two things: During the harsh winter of and the first months ofwhilst preparing a PhD-application for the FWO, we agreed that something was missing in the study of the New Historicism.
The Poetics and Politics of Culture. A Foundation for the New Historicism?
Rather, the term denotes, in his view, a variety of reading practices that share the determination to move beyond the limits of the Old Historicism on the one hand and the New Criticism on the other Greenblatt and Gallagher New Historicism and Contemporary Criticism. I hope that my thesis provides an answer to a yet unexplored question within the existing research on the New Historicism.
Louis Montrose – Wikipedia
Greenblatt, Stephen and G. However, what does this tell us about the New Historicism? Aram Veeser defined the following aspects as reoccurring in and thus characteristic of the reading practice that is New Historicism.
The first question that thus needs to be asked is what is the reader, in terms of the New Historicism? A Conversation with the Living: There is just too much material at hand and it would require years of research in order to arrive at factual claims about the definitive poetics of the New Historicism if there can ever be such a thing in the first prfessing.
Though this thesis refers to the New Historicism as a reading practice or method rather than a theory, there is at least a shared theoretically based methodology: